Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed
remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. (1 John 3:9)
This verse is straightforward, clear, and easy to
understand. People who are born of God do not commit sin. And who is born of
God? The same epistle answers the question:
Whosoever
believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth
him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. (1 John 5:1)
Therefore, all believers in Christ do not commit sin. That
should settle the matter. Christians don’t sin. Yet, the vast majority of the
church today flatly rejects this biblical truth. In fact, most say almost
exactly the opposite, that all Christians will sin until they die. Some go so
far as to say that all Christians will sin every single day in thought, word,
and deed.
How did so many come to reject a biblical truth that is so
clearly stated by the apostle John? Perhaps some want to hang on to their sins
and still feel secure about going to heaven. Others have simply been blinded by
the teachings of others, and since they have never been told about this truth
and have seen it denied time and again, they just accept the teachings that
contradict John’s clear declaration.
Since those who deny holiness in believers still claim to
believe what the Bible says, they have to somehow answer what this verse says.
The most common method is to alter the text. This altering has become so
ingrained in the church culture that modern Bible translations have incorporated
the additions, even though the original language cannot support the
alterations.
Here is one example from the New American Standard Bible:
No
one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he
cannot sin, because he is born of God.
The Greek word for “practices” is prasso, but that word in
not in this verse. The word here is poieo, which means “do” or “commit.” Therefore,
the verse is not saying that believers don’t practice sin. It says that they
don’t commit sin.
The New International Version says:
No one who is born of God will continue to
sin, because God's seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because
they have been born of God.
This version adds “will continue to” which is not in the Greek
text.
Since John’s intent is to make a statement about the absence
of sin in a believer, what good would it do to talk about “practicing” sin or
“continuing” to sin? What frequency of sin does it take to “practice” sin? What
does it mean to continue to sin? If we try to employ these alterations, what
has John said that provides us any useful information? Does he mean that
Christians don’t sin more than three times each day? Five times each week?
Without a clear definition of what constitutes practice or continuing, he has
communicated no information at all. Everyone would draw a different line.
Some people claim that the present tense verb “poieo”
indicates ongoing action. It is true that the Greek present indicative can have
an ongoing aspect. Some call it “present durative.” The present
indicative can have this aspect but certainly not in all cases. There are
other possible aspects for this tense: iterative, gnomic, historic, futuristic,
among others. In order to determine the proper aspect, we have to examine the
context. It is wrong to assign the present durative as a default.
Let's look at the logic to see this. If someone claims that
verse nine allows for some sin in a Christian, then we lose the purpose of the passage.
In context John uses this statement to give us a way to determine who the
children of God are. Here is the verse with it's immediate context:
Little
children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous,
even as he is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil
sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested,
that he might destroy the works of the devil. Whosoever is born of God doth not
commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is
born of God. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the
devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth
not his brother. (1 John 3:7-10)
If any sin is allowed in a believer, how is it manifest who
the children of God and the children of the devil are? If Christians sin until
they die, how are we to tell them from the children of the devil? Do children
of the devil sin more often? How often is that? Do some children of the devil
sin less often than brand new Christians? How many sins are allowed in a child
of God and with what frequency? With any sin allowed in a child of God, how can
their identity possibly be manifest?
The only way the identification is manifest is when we apply the only clearly
defined line. Children of God don't sin at all while children of the devil do sin.
That's why poieo in verse nine must be “gnomic” rather than
durative, because it creates a postulate by which we can make judgments. That's
what a gnomic present tense does. Therefore, we must translate and understand verse
nine as the King James version has rendered it – “Whosoever is born of God doth
not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is
born of God.”
Some alter the meaning of the verse to say something like,
“Christians don’t sin without feeling guilty about it” or some other
qualification. Yet, there is nothing in the Greek whatsoever that says anything
about "without feeling guilty." Such alterations are pure fabrications that are added to satisfy a preconceived doctrine.
Even if we were to allow such alterations, the passage would
make no sense, because many unbelievers feel an immense sense of guilt after
committing a sin, so John wouldn’t be saying anything. We could say, “So what
if believers don’t sin without feeling guilt? The same is true of many
unbelievers.”
And even if one were to deny that unbelievers feel guilty
when they sin, such an idea runs again into the same problem with verse ten. If
both groups, children of God and children of the devil, commit sin and the only
difference is that the children of God feel guilty, then how is it manifest which
group is which? How can you tell which group is feeling guilty? The test John
provides would be worthless.
John indicates in other parts of his epistle that Christians
have no sin at all, thereby proving that verse nine ought to be interpreted as
allowing for no sin. Verse seven is an example:
“Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth
righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.”
How righteous? As righteous as Jesus is. That would mean no sin at all.
Look at 1 John 4:17:
Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
We are as Jesus is in this world. Does that allow for any sin? It cannot.
The righteousness that John teaches for believers is complete. If any sin at all is allowed, then we would not be "as he is righteous." We would not be "as he is."
Summary:
1 John 3:9 sets up a principle: Believers in Christ do not
sin. Some claim that since John used the present tense, he had in mind “continuing
sin” or some other practice of sin that persists in a durative manner. Actually,
the verb “commit” must carry a gnomic aspect and cannot be translated or
interpreted with an understanding that any sin is allowed. This principle is
used as a test in verse ten to judge who is and who is not a child of God. If
any sin is allowed, then the test is worthless. No one would be able to tell
who is and who is not a child of God.
John stated that Christians do not sin in a straightforward
and clear manner. He used the present tense because that is the only tense he
could employ to state the principle as being true in a present sense.
(Some claim that this idea contradicts 1 John 1:8 and 10. I
have refuted that claim in the following essay - http://oraclesoffire.blogspot.com/2009/02/cleansed-from-all-sin.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.